<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InternetDrugLaw.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetdruglaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internetdruglaw.com</link>
	<description>Criminal Defense Attorney Analysis of Internet Pharmacy, Prescription, and Drug Law</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Doctor Pleads Guilty to Online Pharmacy Law Violations</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/11/01/doctor-pleads-guilty-to-online-pharmacy-law-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/11/01/doctor-pleads-guilty-to-online-pharmacy-law-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[License Revocation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Forfeiture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sentence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 20, 2010, Dr. Enrique Rivera Mass pled guilty in the U.S. District Court of North Dakota
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On October 20, 2010, <strong>Dr. Enrique Rivera Mass </strong>pled guilty in the U.S. District Court of North Dakota</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/11/01/doctor-pleads-guilty-to-online-pharmacy-law-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Lawsuit Against Online Pharmacy Adwords Advertisers In Depth</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/12/google-lawsuit-against-online-pharmacy-adwords-advertisers-in-depth/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/12/google-lawsuit-against-online-pharmacy-adwords-advertisers-in-depth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Website Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I wrote about the recent lawsuit filed by Google against certain internet pharmacy advertisers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Yesterday, I wrote about the recent <a title="Google internet pharmacy lawsuit" href="http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/10/google-files-suit-against-internet-pharmacy-advertisers/" target="_self">lawsuit</a> filed by <strong>Google</strong> against certain <strong>internet pharmacy advertisers</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/12/google-lawsuit-against-online-pharmacy-adwords-advertisers-in-depth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Files Suit Against Internet Pharmacy Advertisers</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/10/google-files-suit-against-internet-pharmacy-advertisers/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/10/google-files-suit-against-internet-pharmacy-advertisers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Website Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In late September, Google filed a federal lawsuit, the first of its kind, against a number of &#8220;rogue&#8221; internet pharmacy advertisers and affiliates that Google claimed violated its Google Adwords policies.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In late September, Google filed a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/taking-rogue-pharmacies-to-court.html" target="_blank">federal lawsuit</a>, the first of its kind, against a number of &#8220;rogue&#8221; internet pharmacy advertisers and affiliates that Google claimed violated its Google Adwords policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/10/google-files-suit-against-internet-pharmacy-advertisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Pharmacy Doctor Charged With Prescribing Without Examinations</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/internet-pharmacy-doctor-charged-with-prescribing-drugs-without-physical-examinations/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/internet-pharmacy-doctor-charged-with-prescribing-drugs-without-physical-examinations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Charles McCool]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[State Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Charles McCool, a Pennsylvania doctor, was charged in Pennsylvania state court for prescribing controlled substances via an internet pharmacy to patients without a prior physical examination.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Dr. Charles McCool</strong>, a Pennsylvania doctor, was <a href="http://gantdaily.com/2010/10/04/allegheny-county-doctor-charged-with-prescribing-prescription-drugs-to-patients-he-never-examined-internet-scheme-stretched-across-pennsylvania/" target="_blank">charged</a> in Pennsylvania state court for prescribing controlled substances via an <strong>internet pharmacy</strong> to patients without a prior <strong>physical examination</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/internet-pharmacy-doctor-charged-with-prescribing-drugs-without-physical-examinations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Warns of Pet Internet Pharmacies</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/fda-warns-of-pet-internet-pharmacies/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/fda-warns-of-pet-internet-pharmacies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Website Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSAIDs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prescription drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March 2010, the FDA released a report warning users of the potentially &#8220;fraudulent&#8221; practices associated with internet pharmacies selling medication for pets, such as heartworm preventatives and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In March 2010, the FDA released a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm115432.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> warning users of the potentially &#8220;fraudulent&#8221; practices associated with <strong>internet pharmacies</strong> selling medication for pets, such as heartworm preventatives and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2010/10/07/fda-warns-of-pet-internet-pharmacies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Several Articles Coming Over the Next Few Weeks</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/08/03/several-articles-coming-over-the-next-few-weeks/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/08/03/several-articles-coming-over-the-next-few-weeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for my absence.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Sorry for my absence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/08/03/several-articles-coming-over-the-next-few-weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Rests in AffPower Internet Pharmacy Trial</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/05/government-rests-in-affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/05/government-rests-in-affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Aff Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Misbranding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Non-Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government rested on May 27, 2009 in the AffPower Internet pharmacy case, unique for its longevity as well as the attempted prosecution of online pharmacy affiliates
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The Government rested on May 27, 2009 in the <strong>AffPower Internet pharmacy </strong>case, unique for its longevity as well as the attempted prosecution of online pharmacy affiliates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/05/government-rests-in-affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Indicted on Internet Pharmacy Law Non-Controlled Substances Charges</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/03/doctor-indicted-on-internet-pharmacy-law-non-controlled-substances-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/03/doctor-indicted-on-internet-pharmacy-law-non-controlled-substances-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Indictment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Misbranding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motion to Dismiss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Non-Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torino Jennings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Torino Jennings, a Virgnia doctor, faces Internet pharmacy charges in a Boston District Court.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><strong>Torino Jennings</strong>, a Virgnia doctor, faces <strong>Internet pharmacy </strong>charges in a Boston District Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/06/03/doctor-indicted-on-internet-pharmacy-law-non-controlled-substances-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas Pharmacist Pleads No Contest in Internet Pharmacy Law Case</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/16/kansas-pharmacist-pleads-no-contest-in-internet-pharmacy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/16/kansas-pharmacist-pleads-no-contest-in-internet-pharmacy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Hearing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hogan's Pharmacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[State Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kansas pharmacist, Rick Kloxin, pled no contest to 14 misdemeanor counts in the Hogan&#8217;s Pharmacy
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Kansas pharmacist, Rick Kloxin, pled no contest to 14 misdemeanor counts in the Hogan&#8217;s Pharmacy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/16/kansas-pharmacist-pleads-no-contest-in-internet-pharmacy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Internet Pharmacy Doctor &#8220;Good Faith&#8221; Jury Instruction</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/10/the-internet-pharmacy-doctor-good-faith-jury-instruction/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/10/the-internet-pharmacy-doctor-good-faith-jury-instruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Website Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Appeals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jury instructions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many federal circuits permit a good faith jury instruction in cases in which doctors are prosecuted under the Controlled Substances Act.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Many federal circuits permit a good faith jury instruction in cases in which doctors are prosecuted under the Controlled Substances Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/05/10/the-internet-pharmacy-doctor-good-faith-jury-instruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Finds JIVE Internet Pharmacy Defendants Guilty</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/30/jury-finds-jive-internet-pharmacy-defendants-guilty/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/30/jury-finds-jive-internet-pharmacy-defendants-guilty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conviction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JIVE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Orlando Sentential
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">According to the <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/orl-bk-lacour-pharmacy-federal-internet-043001,0,2731643.story?track=rss" target="_blank">Orlando Sentential</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/30/jury-finds-jive-internet-pharmacy-defendants-guilty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The JIVE Internet Pharmacy Case Goes to the Jury</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/29/the-jive-internet-pharmacy-case-goes-to-the-jury/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/29/the-jive-internet-pharmacy-case-goes-to-the-jury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JIVE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jury began deliberating in the JIVE online pharmacy network trial yesterday at 3p.m.
The content on this post does not constitute legal advice and is for informational purposes only.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The jury began deliberating in the JIVE online pharmacy network trial yesterday at 3p.m.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>The content on this post does not constitute legal advice and is for informational purposes only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/29/the-jive-internet-pharmacy-case-goes-to-the-jury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Couple Pleads Guilty to Operating Online Pharmacy Network</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/27/florida-couple-pleads-guilty-to-operating-online-pharmacy-network/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/27/florida-couple-pleads-guilty-to-operating-online-pharmacy-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jose Riopedre and Susana Mendez both pled guilty in the District Court for the District of Maryland today to conspiring to distribute more than two million doses of Phentermine via an internet pharmacy.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Jose Riopedre and Susana Mendez both pled guilty in the District Court for the District of Maryland today to conspiring to distribute more than two million doses of Phentermine via an internet pharmacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/27/florida-couple-pleads-guilty-to-operating-online-pharmacy-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Pharmacy Owner Pleads Guilty to Misbranding</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/23/internet-pharmacy-owner-pleads-guilty-to-misbranding/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/23/internet-pharmacy-owner-pleads-guilty-to-misbranding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Non-Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fritz Brunz pled guilty
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Fritz Brunz pled <a href="http://http://www.imperialvalleynews.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=5323&amp;Itemid=1" target="_blank">guilty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/23/internet-pharmacy-owner-pleads-guilty-to-misbranding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bellingham, WA Doctor Investigated for Internet Pharmacy Ties</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/21/bellingham-wa-doctor-investigated-for-internet-pharmacy-ties/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/21/bellingham-wa-doctor-investigated-for-internet-pharmacy-ties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Seattle Times, the home of Dr. Peter Pfeiffer, of Bellingham, Washington, was raided by DEA agents last Friday as a result of his alleged ties to an Internet pharmacy.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">According to the <a title="search warrant" href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009094501_webdoctor21m.html" target="_blank">Seattle Times</a>, the home of Dr. Peter Pfeiffer, of Bellingham, Washington, was raided by DEA agents last Friday as a result of his alleged ties to an Internet pharmacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/21/bellingham-wa-doctor-investigated-for-internet-pharmacy-ties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hageseth Sentenced to Nine Months in Internet Pharmacy Case</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/19/hageseth-sentenced-to-nine-months-in-internet-pharmacy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/19/hageseth-sentenced-to-nine-months-in-internet-pharmacy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hageseth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sentence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[State Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado doctor Christian Hageseth was sentenced to nine months in prison by a California judge following his plea of no contest to practicing medicine without a license in California.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Colorado doctor Christian Hageseth was sentenced to nine months in prison by a California judge following his plea of no contest to practicing medicine without a license in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/19/hageseth-sentenced-to-nine-months-in-internet-pharmacy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan Haight Effective Date: April 13, 2009</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/14/ryan-haight-effective-date-april-13-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/14/ryan-haight-effective-date-april-13-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday was the effective date for a majority of the provisions in the Ryan Haight Act (Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Yesterday was the effective date for a majority of the provisions in the <a title="Ryan Haight Act" href="http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/03/12/criminal-defense-attorney-articles-library-on-internet-pharmacy-law/" target="_blank">Ryan Haight Act</a> (Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/14/ryan-haight-effective-date-april-13-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AffPower Internet Pharmacy Trial Began This Week</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/11/affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial-began-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/11/affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial-began-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AffPower]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JIVE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Non-Controlled Substances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AffPower network Internet pharmacy trial began this week in the Southern District of California for the remaining AffPower defendants Dolores Lovin, Mary Aronson, Richard Edward Koch, Philip James Bidwell, Jeffrey A. Light and Peter P. Bragansa.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>AffPower</strong> network <strong>Internet pharmacy trial</strong> began this week in the Southern District of California for the remaining AffPower defendants Dolores Lovin, Mary Aronson, Richard Edward Koch, Philip James Bidwell, Jeffrey A. Light and Peter P. Bragansa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/11/affpower-internet-pharmacy-trial-began-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Ryan Haight Act Rule, Effective Date, and Internet Pharmacy Law</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/08/the-new-ryan-haight-act-rule-effective-date-and-internet-pharmacy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/08/the-new-ryan-haight-act-rule-effective-date-and-internet-pharmacy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[License Revocation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Consultations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Haight Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Website Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Appeals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Pharmacy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final rule on the "Implementation of the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act" (aka Ryan Haight Act) was published in the Federal Register Monday by the DEA and DOJ.  It can be found here.  It draws some interesting conclusions with respect to internet pharmacy law, and the new regulations only serve to increase already existing legal ambiguity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The final Rule on the &#8220;Implementation of the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act&#8221; (aka <a title="Ryan Haight Act" href="http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/03/12/criminal-defense-attorney-articles-library-on-internet-pharmacy-law/" target="_blank">Ryan Haight Act</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/08/the-new-ryan-haight-act-rule-effective-date-and-internet-pharmacy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. v. Hernandez: Judge Grants Motion to Dismiss in Internet Pharmacy Case</title>
		<link>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/06/us-v-hernandez-judge-grants-motion-to-dismiss-in-internet-pharmacy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/06/us-v-hernandez-judge-grants-motion-to-dismiss-in-internet-pharmacy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motion to Dismiss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Hernandez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetdruglaw.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Saturday, I noted that the Government moved to dismiss the federal indictment against the remaining internet pharmacy defendants in U.S. v.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On <a title="U.S. v. Hernandez" href="http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/04/government-dismiss-indictment-in-us-v-hernandez-bc-of-advice-of-counsel-defense/" target="_blank">Saturday</a>, I noted that the Government moved to dismiss the federal indictment against the remaining internet pharmacy defendants in U.S. v.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internetdruglaw.com/2009/04/06/us-v-hernandez-judge-grants-motion-to-dismiss-in-internet-pharmacy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
